{"id":304,"date":"2020-06-02T11:34:29","date_gmt":"2020-06-02T18:34:29","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/beta10.technodreamcenter.com\/rpbtucson.com\/?p=304"},"modified":"2023-08-29T16:41:49","modified_gmt":"2023-08-29T23:41:49","slug":"howell-decision","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/beta10.technodreamcenter.com\/rpbtucson.com\/howell-decision\/","title":{"rendered":"Howell Decision"},"content":{"rendered":"<h1>Howell Decision<\/h1>\n<div>\n<p>Howell v. Howell.<\/p>\n<p>On Monday, May 17th, 2017, The United States Supreme Court ruled on the case <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scotusblog.com\/case-files\/cases\/howell-v-howell\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Howell v. Howell<\/em>,<\/a> a case The Law Office of Matthew Randle has been following closely and wrote about earlier.<\/p>\n<p>The case was based on Mr. Howell and Mrs. Howell\u2019s 1991 divorce. The couple was litigating their divorce within 1 year until Mr. Howell&#8217;s retirement from the military. In the end, the couple\u2019s divorce decree specified that Mrs. Howell would receive half of his military retirement pay. But in 2005, was awarded VA Disability pay that reduced his retirement by $250, which reduced Mrs. Howell\u2019s monthly portion by $125. Claiming that her personal property interest in the retirement had been wrongly reduced Mrs. Howell went back to court, where she argued that, even if Mr. Howell\u2019s retirement pay had been reduced, she should still receive half of what his retirement pay would have been without the disability benefits. The Maricopa Superior Court, Arizona State Appellate Court, and the Arizona State Supreme Court all agreed with her, but on May 15, 2017, the US Supreme Court reversed, siding with Mr. Howell.<\/p>\n<h2>What is the Howell decision ruling based on?<\/h2>\n<p>The ruling was largely based on the Uniformed Services Former Spouses\u2019 Protection Act, a 1982 federal law governing the disposition of military retirement pay in divorces, and<em><u> Mansell v. Mansell<\/u><\/em>, a 1989 Supreme Court case interpreting that statute.<\/p>\n<p>The Uniformed Services Former Spouses\u2019 Protection Act makes clear that state courts can divide up \u201cdisposable retired pay,\u201d which it defines as the service member\u2019s retired pay, minus any portion of that pay waived in favor of disability benefits. And in <em><u>Mansell v. Mansell<\/u><\/em>, the court ruled that the act does not permit state courts to treat retirement pay that has been waived to receive veterans\u2019 disability benefits as something that can be divided.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignright wp-image-470 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/beta10.technodreamcenter.com\/rpbtucson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/Howell-v.-Howell.jpg\" alt=\"Howell v. Howell\" width=\"400\" height=\"581\" srcset=\"https:\/\/beta10.technodreamcenter.com\/rpbtucson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/Howell-v.-Howell.jpg 400w, https:\/\/beta10.technodreamcenter.com\/rpbtucson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/Howell-v.-Howell-207x300.jpg 207w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 400px) 100vw, 400px\" \/><\/p>\n<p>The justices agreed with Mr. Howell and his argument that <em>his VA Disability Pay was non-divisible, even after the divorce decree was finalized<\/em><em><u>. <\/u><\/em>The Court explained that under federal law state courts simply lack the authority to divide up Mr. Howell\u2019s disability benefits, even if it means that Mrs. Howell winds up receiving less money than she might have originally. Further, the Court clarified that the state courts can\u2019t get around the restrictions imposed by federal law by characterizing the award to Mrs. Howell as an order to Mr. Howell to \u201creimburse\u201d her for the money that she no longer receives.<\/p>\n<h2>Justice Breyer opinion on the Howell Decision<\/h2>\n<p>In his opinion, Justice Breyer acknowledged that the federal statute and today\u2019s ruling could make things harder for former military spouses like Mrs. Howell. Explaining the potential implications of this ruling Justice Breyer suggested that, going forward, state courts can try to account for the possibility that a veteran could later waive some part of retirement pay in favor of disability benefits through some other community property or support offset.<\/p>\n<p>Important note for retired service members and their former spouses is that this case does not impact those who are retired and receive VA Disability compensation for being rated 50% disabled or more. Because of the Concurrent Benefit program, which we wrote about here, a retired service member who is both retired and rated at 50% or more, will receive BOTH amounts in full (VA and Retirement). As such the former spouse&#8217;s portion of a community property award would not be reduced by electing VA Disability pay.<\/p>\n<h2>Contact Randle, Palmer, &amp; Associates for legal help today<\/h2>\n<p>As always, it is of the utmost importance that if either party in a divorce is eligible for any Military or VA benefits you hire counsel that understands and knows the rules so that your rights are protected. The Law Office of Randle, Palmer, &amp; Associates is considered a Subject Matter Expert in this area and is here to help you through the tough times.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p><!--more--><br \/>\n<!-- {\"children\":[{\"type\":\"section\",\"props\":{\"style\":\"default\",\"width\":\"\",\"vertical_align\":\"bottom\",\"title_position\":\"top-left\",\"title_rotation\":\"left\",\"title_breakpoint\":\"xl\",\"image_position\":\"center-center\",\"text_color\":\"light\",\"height\":\"percent\",\"image\":\"wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2020\\\/06\\\/howell-decision.jpg\",\"image_size\":\"cover\",\"class\":\"subpageHero\",\"padding_remove_bottom\":true},\"children\":[{\"type\":\"row\",\"children\":[{\"type\":\"column\",\"props\":{\"image_position\":\"center-center\",\"media_overlay_gradient\":\"\",\"width_medium\":\"1-1\",\"position_sticky_breakpoint\":\"m\"},\"children\":[{\"type\":\"headline\",\"props\":{\"title_element\":\"h1\",\"title_style\":\"heading-medium\",\"text_align\":\"center\",\"content\":\"Howell Decision\"}}]}]}],\"name\":\"Subpage Hero\"},{\"type\":\"section\",\"props\":{\"style\":\"default\",\"width\":\"default\",\"vertical_align\":\"middle\",\"title_position\":\"top-left\",\"title_rotation\":\"left\",\"title_breakpoint\":\"xl\",\"image_position\":\"center-center\"},\"children\":[{\"type\":\"row\",\"children\":[{\"type\":\"column\",\"props\":{\"image_position\":\"center-center\",\"media_overlay_gradient\":\"\",\"width_medium\":\"1-1\",\"position_sticky_breakpoint\":\"m\"},\"children\":[{\"type\":\"text\",\"props\":{\"margin\":\"default\",\"column_breakpoint\":\"m\",\"content\":\"\n\n<p>Howell v. Howell.<\\\/p>\\n\n\n<p>On Monday, May 17th, 2017, The United States Supreme Court ruled on the case <a href=\\\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scotusblog.com\\\/case-files\\\/cases\\\/howell-v-howell\\\/\\\" target=\\\"_blank\\\" rel=\\\"noopener\\\"><em>Howell v. Howell<\\\/em>,<\\\/a> a case The Law Office of Matthew Randle has been following closely and wrote about earlier.<\\\/p>\\n\n\n<p>The case was based on Mr. Howell and Mrs. Howell\\u2019s 1991 divorce. The couple was litigating their divorce within 1 year until Mr. Howell's retirement from the military. In the end, the couple\\u2019s divorce decree specified that Mrs. Howell would receive half of his military retirement pay. But in 2005, was awarded VA Disability pay that reduced his retirement by $250, which reduced Mrs. Howell\\u2019s monthly portion by $125. Claiming that her personal property interest in the retirement had been wrongly reduced Mrs. Howell went back to court, where she argued that, even if Mr. Howell\\u2019s retirement pay had been reduced, she should still receive half of what his retirement pay would have been without the disability benefits. The Maricopa Superior Court, Arizona State Appellate Court, and the Arizona State Supreme Court all agreed with her, but on May 15, 2017, the US Supreme Court reversed, siding with Mr. Howell.<\\\/p>\\n\n\n<h2>What is the Howell decision ruling based on?<\\\/h2>\\n\n\n<p>The ruling was largely based on the Uniformed Services Former Spouses\\u2019 Protection Act, a 1982 federal law governing the disposition of military retirement pay in divorces, and<em><u> Mansell v. Mansell<\\\/u><\\\/em>, a 1989 Supreme Court case interpreting that statute.<\\\/p>\\n\n\n<p>The Uniformed Services Former Spouses\\u2019 Protection Act makes clear that state courts can divide up \\u201cdisposable retired pay,\\u201d which it defines as the service member\\u2019s retired pay, minus any portion of that pay waived in favor of disability benefits. And in <em><u>Mansell v. Mansell<\\\/u><\\\/em>, the court ruled that the act does not permit state courts to treat retirement pay that has been waived to receive veterans\\u2019 disability benefits as something that can be divided.<\\\/p>\\n\n\n<p><img class=\\\"alignright wp-image-470 size-full\\\" src=\\\"https:\\\/\\\/beta10.technodreamcenter.com\\\/rpbtucson.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2020\\\/07\\\/Howell-v.-Howell.jpg\\\" alt=\\\"Howell v. Howell\\\" width=\\\"400\\\" height=\\\"581\\\" \\\/><\\\/p>\\n\n\n<p>The justices agreed with Mr. Howell and his argument that <em>his VA Disability Pay was non-divisible, even after the divorce decree was finalized<\\\/em><em><u>. <\\\/u><\\\/em>The Court explained that under federal law state courts simply lack the authority to divide up Mr. Howell\\u2019s disability benefits, even if it means that Mrs. Howell winds up receiving less money than she might have originally. Further, the Court clarified that the state courts can\\u2019t get around the restrictions imposed by federal law by characterizing the award to Mrs. Howell as an order to Mr. Howell to \\u201creimburse\\u201d her for the money that she no longer receives.<\\\/p>\\n\n\n<h2>Justice Breyer opinion on the Howell Decision<\\\/h2>\\n\n\n<p>In his opinion, Justice Breyer acknowledged that the federal statute and today\\u2019s ruling could make things harder for former military spouses like Mrs. Howell. Explaining the potential implications of this ruling Justice Breyer suggested that, going forward, state courts can try to account for the possibility that a veteran could later waive some part of retirement pay in favor of disability benefits through some other community property or support offset.<\\\/p>\\n\n\n<p>Important note for retired service members and their former spouses is that this case does not impact those who are retired and receive VA Disability compensation for being rated 50% disabled or more. Because of the Concurrent Benefit program, which we wrote about here, a retired service member who is both retired and rated at 50% or more, will receive BOTH amounts in full (VA and Retirement). As such the former spouse's portion of a community property award would not be reduced by electing VA Disability pay.<\\\/p>\\n\n\n<h2>Contact Randle, Palmer, &amp; Associates for legal help today<\\\/h2>\\n\n\n<p>As always, it is of the utmost importance that if either party in a divorce is eligible for any Military or VA benefits you hire counsel that understands and knows the rules so that your rights are protected. The Law Office of Randle, Palmer, &amp; Associates is considered a Subject Matter Expert in this area and is here to help you through the tough times.<\\\/p>\"}}]}]}]}],\"version\":\"2.7.22\",\"type\":\"layout\"} --><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Howell Decision Howell v. Howell. On Monday, May 17th, 2017, The United States Supreme Court ruled on the case Howell v. Howell, a case The Law Office of Matthew Randle has been following closely and wrote about earlier. The case was based on Mr. Howell and Mrs. Howell\u2019s 1991 divorce. The couple was litigating their [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"two_page_speed":[],"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-304","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-decision"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v24.8.1 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Howell Decision - Randle Palmer &amp; Associates | Howell v. Howell<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Read about the reason and the results of the Howell Decision, and how this can affect a case you may be dealing with today. Howell v. Howell\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/beta10.technodreamcenter.com\/rpbtucson.com\/howell-decision\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Howell Decision - Randle Palmer &amp; Associates | Howell v. Howell\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Read about the reason and the results of the Howell Decision, and how this can affect a case you may be dealing with today. Howell v. Howell\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/beta10.technodreamcenter.com\/rpbtucson.com\/howell-decision\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Randle Palmer &amp; Associates\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-06-02T18:34:29+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-08-29T23:41:49+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/beta10.technodreamcenter.com\/rpbtucson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/Howell-v.-Howell.jpg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"rpbstaging\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"rpbstaging\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/beta10.technodreamcenter.com\/rpbtucson.com\/howell-decision\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/beta10.technodreamcenter.com\/rpbtucson.com\/howell-decision\/\",\"name\":\"Howell Decision - Randle Palmer &amp; Associates | Howell v. Howell\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/beta10.technodreamcenter.com\/rpbtucson.com\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/beta10.technodreamcenter.com\/rpbtucson.com\/howell-decision\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/beta10.technodreamcenter.com\/rpbtucson.com\/howell-decision\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/beta10.technodreamcenter.com\/rpbtucson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/Howell-v.-Howell.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2020-06-02T18:34:29+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-08-29T23:41:49+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/beta10.technodreamcenter.com\/rpbtucson.com\/#\/schema\/person\/fa53b0ccef9c8044bdeec50b3bd71771\"},\"description\":\"Read about the reason and the results of the Howell Decision, and how this can affect a case you may be dealing with today. Howell v. Howell\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/beta10.technodreamcenter.com\/rpbtucson.com\/howell-decision\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/beta10.technodreamcenter.com\/rpbtucson.com\/howell-decision\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/beta10.technodreamcenter.com\/rpbtucson.com\/howell-decision\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/beta10.technodreamcenter.com\/rpbtucson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/Howell-v.-Howell.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/beta10.technodreamcenter.com\/rpbtucson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/Howell-v.-Howell.jpg\",\"width\":400,\"height\":581,\"caption\":\"Howell v. Howell\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/beta10.technodreamcenter.com\/rpbtucson.com\/howell-decision\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/beta10.technodreamcenter.com\/rpbtucson.com\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Howell Decision\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/beta10.technodreamcenter.com\/rpbtucson.com\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/beta10.technodreamcenter.com\/rpbtucson.com\/\",\"name\":\"Randle Palmer &amp; Associates\",\"description\":\"Family First | Family Law\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/beta10.technodreamcenter.com\/rpbtucson.com\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/beta10.technodreamcenter.com\/rpbtucson.com\/#\/schema\/person\/fa53b0ccef9c8044bdeec50b3bd71771\",\"name\":\"rpbstaging\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/beta10.technodreamcenter.com\/rpbtucson.com\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/775a4c234f0b7eb4c37309d60ea4fbb46b57bc2202f7e45f14874cd18fa9bacc?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/775a4c234f0b7eb4c37309d60ea4fbb46b57bc2202f7e45f14874cd18fa9bacc?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"rpbstaging\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/beta10.technodreamcenter.com\/rpbtucson.com\"]}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Howell Decision - Randle Palmer &amp; Associates | Howell v. Howell","description":"Read about the reason and the results of the Howell Decision, and how this can affect a case you may be dealing with today. Howell v. Howell","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/beta10.technodreamcenter.com\/rpbtucson.com\/howell-decision\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Howell Decision - Randle Palmer &amp; Associates | Howell v. Howell","og_description":"Read about the reason and the results of the Howell Decision, and how this can affect a case you may be dealing with today. Howell v. Howell","og_url":"https:\/\/beta10.technodreamcenter.com\/rpbtucson.com\/howell-decision\/","og_site_name":"Randle Palmer &amp; Associates","article_published_time":"2020-06-02T18:34:29+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-08-29T23:41:49+00:00","og_image":[{"url":"https:\/\/beta10.technodreamcenter.com\/rpbtucson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/Howell-v.-Howell.jpg","type":"","width":"","height":""}],"author":"rpbstaging","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"rpbstaging","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/beta10.technodreamcenter.com\/rpbtucson.com\/howell-decision\/","url":"https:\/\/beta10.technodreamcenter.com\/rpbtucson.com\/howell-decision\/","name":"Howell Decision - Randle Palmer &amp; Associates | Howell v. Howell","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/beta10.technodreamcenter.com\/rpbtucson.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/beta10.technodreamcenter.com\/rpbtucson.com\/howell-decision\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/beta10.technodreamcenter.com\/rpbtucson.com\/howell-decision\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/beta10.technodreamcenter.com\/rpbtucson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/Howell-v.-Howell.jpg","datePublished":"2020-06-02T18:34:29+00:00","dateModified":"2023-08-29T23:41:49+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/beta10.technodreamcenter.com\/rpbtucson.com\/#\/schema\/person\/fa53b0ccef9c8044bdeec50b3bd71771"},"description":"Read about the reason and the results of the Howell Decision, and how this can affect a case you may be dealing with today. Howell v. Howell","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/beta10.technodreamcenter.com\/rpbtucson.com\/howell-decision\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/beta10.technodreamcenter.com\/rpbtucson.com\/howell-decision\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/beta10.technodreamcenter.com\/rpbtucson.com\/howell-decision\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/beta10.technodreamcenter.com\/rpbtucson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/Howell-v.-Howell.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/beta10.technodreamcenter.com\/rpbtucson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/Howell-v.-Howell.jpg","width":400,"height":581,"caption":"Howell v. Howell"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/beta10.technodreamcenter.com\/rpbtucson.com\/howell-decision\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/beta10.technodreamcenter.com\/rpbtucson.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Howell Decision"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/beta10.technodreamcenter.com\/rpbtucson.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/beta10.technodreamcenter.com\/rpbtucson.com\/","name":"Randle Palmer &amp; Associates","description":"Family First | Family Law","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/beta10.technodreamcenter.com\/rpbtucson.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/beta10.technodreamcenter.com\/rpbtucson.com\/#\/schema\/person\/fa53b0ccef9c8044bdeec50b3bd71771","name":"rpbstaging","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/beta10.technodreamcenter.com\/rpbtucson.com\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/775a4c234f0b7eb4c37309d60ea4fbb46b57bc2202f7e45f14874cd18fa9bacc?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/775a4c234f0b7eb4c37309d60ea4fbb46b57bc2202f7e45f14874cd18fa9bacc?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"rpbstaging"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/beta10.technodreamcenter.com\/rpbtucson.com"]}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/beta10.technodreamcenter.com\/rpbtucson.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/304","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/beta10.technodreamcenter.com\/rpbtucson.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/beta10.technodreamcenter.com\/rpbtucson.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/beta10.technodreamcenter.com\/rpbtucson.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/beta10.technodreamcenter.com\/rpbtucson.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=304"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/beta10.technodreamcenter.com\/rpbtucson.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/304\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/beta10.technodreamcenter.com\/rpbtucson.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=304"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/beta10.technodreamcenter.com\/rpbtucson.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=304"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/beta10.technodreamcenter.com\/rpbtucson.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=304"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}